Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Radeon Instinct MI60

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon Instinct MI60

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Radeon Instinct MI60 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1800MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1024GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Radeon Instinct MI60 +725%
14750
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1024GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
460.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.373 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Vega 20
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy