Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs RTX A5500

Quadro M2000 vs RTX A5500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 230W)
RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (1665MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
9472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
RTX A5500 +1809%
34100
Blender
Quadro M2000
145
RTX A5500 +2876%
4316
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
RTX A5500 +2028%
596
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1080 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
768
Shading Units
10240
48
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
230W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GA102
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy