Quadro RTX 8000 vs Data Center GPU Max 1350
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1770MHz vs 1550MHz)
Lower TDP (260W vs 450W)
Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (96GB vs 48GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000
16310
Data Center GPU Max 1350
+172%
44440
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
750 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
14336
288
TMUs
896
96
ROPs
0
576
Tensor Cores
896
72
RT Cores
112
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
450W
600 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
100 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
