Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

VS

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

We compared two laptop CPUs: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus with 10 cores 3.4GHz and AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 with 10 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus 's Advantages

Higher specification of memory (LPDDR5X-8448 vs LPDDR5X-7500)

Larger memory bandwidth (135GB/s vs 89.6GB/s)

Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 2.0GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (42MB vs 24MB)

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 's Advantages

Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus

2418

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 +19%

2894

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus

13147

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 +36%

17892

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus

VS

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

General Parameters

Apr 2024

Release Date

Jun 2024

Qualcomm

Manufacturer

Amd

Laptop

Type

Laptop

ARMv9

Instruction Set

x86-64

Snapdragon X

Core Architecture

Zen 5 (Strix Point)

X1E-84-100

Processor Number

-

Custom

Socket

FP8

Qualcomm Adreno

Integrated Graphics

Radeon 880M

Oryon

Generation

Ryzen AI 9 (Zen 5 (Strix Point))

Package

-

Transistor Count

4 nm

Manufacturing Process

4 nm

Custom

Socket

FP8

23 W

Power Consumption

15-54 W

80 W

Max Turbo Power Consumption

W

Peak Operating Temperature

100°C

Samsung TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

mm²

Die Size

-

I/O Process Size

6 nm

Package

FP8

CPU Performance

10

Performance Cores

10

Performance Core Threads

20

3.4 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.0 GHz

3.4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

5 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

6

-

Efficiency Core Threads

12

10

Total Core Count

10

Total Thread Count

20

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

34x

Multiplier

20x

-

L1 Cache

64 K per core

-

L2 Cache

1 MB per core

42 MB

L3 Cache

24 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

LPDDR5X-8448

Memory Types

DDR5-5600, LPDDR5X-7500

64 GB

Max Memory Size

256 GB

8

Max Memory Channels

2

135 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

89.6 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

2900 MHz

Execution Units

12

3.8 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

0 TFLOPS

AI Accelerator

-

NPU

AMD Ryzen™ AI

-

Theoretical performance

50 TOPS

Miscellaneous

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus

Official Website

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

4.0

PCIe Version

4.0

PCIe Lanes

16

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs Intel Core i7 1255U

2

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite

3

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs Apple M2

4

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs Intel Core i7 1355U

5

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs Intel Core i7 13705H

6

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS

7

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs Intel Core i5 1240U

8

Intel Core i5 1335U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus

9

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs Intel Core i7 8850H

10

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs Intel Core i5 1035G7

Related News

1

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

2

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

3

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

4

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

5

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

6

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

7

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

8

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

9

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

10

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip