Radeon R7 240 OEM vs CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (1410MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 OEM
499
CMP 170HX
+2431%
12630
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Sep 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
320
Shading Units
4480
20
TMUs
280
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A