Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 72% (1590MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1894
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+50%
2849
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU117
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6