Radeon R9 295X2 vs FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1376 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+184%
5733
FireStream 9350
2016
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Jun 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
18
2816
Shading Units
1440
176
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
Cypress
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
5.0
