Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon Instinct MI308X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI308X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (500W vs 750W)
Radeon Instinct MI308X 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
16640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5733
Radeon Instinct MI308X
+1325%
81720
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Dec 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
512bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
304
2816
Shading Units
19456
176
TMUs
1216
64
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
750W
900 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
153 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
N/A
