Home Comparison Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1477MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
3723
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile +62%
6050

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Dec 2021
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1185 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1477 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
2048
Shading Units
2048
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.26 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.53 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.10 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.050 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
189.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
45W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GA107
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
366 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net