Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10G vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA A10G vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
9168 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10G +24718%
31.52 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1320 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
6
9216
Shading Units
48
288
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
G94
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy