Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10G vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA A10G vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1710MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
8576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10G +2143%
31.52 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Blender
A10G +2594%
3664
Quadro M2000M
136
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Dec 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1320 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
9216
Shading Units
640
288
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GM107
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy