Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (1635MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10M +1528%
23.44 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
1046 MHz
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
7168
Shading Units
640
224
TMUs
40
80
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

130.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
366.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
23.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
732.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
68W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy