Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs AMD FirePro S9150

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 231.9GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (235W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe
4.339 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +16%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2014
Tesla
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
2816
40
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
235W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy