Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs AMD Radeon R9 280

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 82% (1695MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 231.9GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe +29%
4.339 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2014
Tesla
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
827 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
933 MHz
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1792
40
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
200W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.313 billion
Unknown
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy