Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A30 PCIe vs AMD FireStream 9270

NVIDIA A30 PCIe vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM A30 PCIe and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A30 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A30 PCIe +760%
10.32 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla Ampere
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
800
224
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy