Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A40 PCIe vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA A40 PCIe vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
10240 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A40 PCIe +5994%
37.42 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
May 2011
Tesla
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
695.8GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
84
SM Count
-
10752
Shading Units
512
336
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
32
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

194.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
584.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
37.42 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
37.42 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
584.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy