Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 770M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
19424 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +204150%
163.4 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 770M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Aug 2008
Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
19456
Shading Units
32
880
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.000 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

750W
TDP
35W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
146 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy