Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
18944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +12167%
163.4 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jul 2011
Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
512
880
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
146 billion
Transistors
3 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

750W
TDP
250W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy