Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

Intel Arc A310 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +22%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Sep 2014
Alchemist
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Tonga
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy