Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 800W)
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (2520MHz vs 1750MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
17664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
TITAN Ada +3356%
92.9 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
2235 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1152GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
144
768
Shading Units
18432
32
TMUs
576
16
ROPs
192
96
Tensor Cores
576
6
RT Cores
144
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
800W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
AD102
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy