Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs ATI FireMV 2250

Intel Arc A350 vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 32W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2007
Alchemist
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
24
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
RV516
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy