Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1150MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 25W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350M +121%
1.766 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Blender
Arc A350M +444%
392
GeForce MX250
72
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
55.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
3.533 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
1.766 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
441.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GP108B
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy