Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600M

Intel Arc A350M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 285W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 127% (2610MHz vs 1150MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350M
1.766 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6600M +2397%
44.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2024
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 40
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
2340 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
66
-
Compute Units
28
768
Shading Units
8448
48
TMUs
264
24
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
264
6
RT Cores
66
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

27.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
55.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
3.533 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
1.766 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
441.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
AD102
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
AD102-225-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
285W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy