Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A380M vs AMD FirePro W4190M

Intel Arc A380M vs AMD FirePro W4190M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380M and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A380M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 122% (2000MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A380M +492%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Nov 2015
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.1)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1550 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Opal
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy