Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A380M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

Intel Arc A380M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A380M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 105% (2000MHz vs 975MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A380M +105%
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition
1.997 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Nov 2014
Alchemist
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.1)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1550 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
975 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
62.40 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.997 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Pitcairn
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy