Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A530M vs AMD FirePro M3900

Intel Arc A530M vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A530M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A530M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1300MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1376 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A530M +1564%
3.994 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Oct 2010
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
160
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-256
GPU Name
Seymour
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.37 billion
Unknown
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy