Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A770 vs ATI FirePro V9800

Intel Arc A770 vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A770 +622%
19.66 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Sep 2010
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2100 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1600
256
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Cypress
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy