Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A770M vs AMD FirePro M3900

Intel Arc A770M vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A770M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3936 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A770M +5533%
13.52 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2010
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
160
256
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

211.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
422.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
27.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

120W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Seymour
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy