Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A30M vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

Intel Arc Pro A30M vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 113% (2000MHz vs 940MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A30M +468%
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Oct 2014
Alchemist
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
940 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.520 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.56 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
721.9 GFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
721.9 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.12 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Topaz
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy