Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40 +799%
3.482 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2009
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
G92B
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy