Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD FireStream 9370

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD FireStream 9370

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +82%
4.813 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2010
Alchemist
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1600
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Cypress
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy