Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A60M vs AMD FirePro W4190M

Intel Arc Pro A60M vs AMD FirePro W4190M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1300MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60M +670%
5.325 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Nov 2015
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

83.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.325 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-256
GPU Name
Opal
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.95 billion
Unknown
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy