Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (2010MHz vs 1300MHz)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60M
5.325 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +131%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Mar 2023
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
3072
128
TMUs
96
64
ROPs
48
256
Tensor Cores
96
16
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

83.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
5.325 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-256
GPU Name
AD107
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy