Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 0System Shared VRAM Quadro FX 470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
6128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +24477%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 470
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Sep 2007
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
System Shared
HBM2e
Memory Type
System Shared
4096bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
6144
Shading Units
16
192
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.640 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

350W
TDP
38W
750 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
C79
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
-
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy