Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (260W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +30%
14.38 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Aug 2018
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
6144
Shading Units
4608
192
TMUs
288
96
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

350W
TDP
260W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy