CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA GRID M60 4A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Boost Clock1178MHz
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+186%
13.82 TFLOPS
GRID M60 4A
4.825 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
VS
GRID M60 4A
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Aug 2015
Xe Graphics
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
2048
240
TMUs
128
120
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
2
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
3
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
4
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
5
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4
6
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q
7
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 8 GB
9
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB
10
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla D870
Related News
1
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
2
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
3
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
4
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
5
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
6
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
7
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
8
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
9
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
10
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy