Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
7328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (152W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +1814%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro 5000
0.722 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Feb 2011
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
320bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
120.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
11
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
352
240
TMUs
44
120
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
640 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.29 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.57 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
722.3 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
361.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
152W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy