Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +63%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Dec 2021
Xe Graphics
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
64GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
104
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
6656
240
TMUs
416
120
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
300W
900 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Generation 12.5
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy