Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
7104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +1699%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jul 2013
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
752 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
48.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
576
240
TMUs
48
120
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.004 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.02 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.4 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
55W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N15P-Q3-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy