Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 416.0GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1545MHz
Lower TDP (160W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +94%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Nov 2018
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
36
7680
Shading Units
2304
240
TMUs
144
120
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
160W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy