Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
7488 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +4139%
13.82 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jun 2013
Xe Graphics
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
192
240
TMUs
16
120
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
130W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy