Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA A10M

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA A10M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 600.2GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
A10M +69%
23.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Feb 2022
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
7168
240
TMUs
224
120
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy