Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
7296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +1501%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Mar 2015
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
384
240
TMUs
16
120
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
30W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
190 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy