CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA Quadro K620
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
7296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+1501%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
VS
Quadro K620
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Jul 2014
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
384
240
TMUs
24
120
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
45W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
2
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
3
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
4
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
5
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
6
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
7
NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB
9
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
10
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla M10
Related News
1
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
2
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
3
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
4
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
5
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
6
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
7
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
8
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
9
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
10
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy