Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +883%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Dec 2015
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
640
240
TMUs
40
120
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
55W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy