Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +542%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Aug 2015
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
1024
240
TMUs
64
120
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy