Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Lower TDP (500W vs 600W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300 +246%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jan 2023
Xe Graphics
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM3
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
14080
240
TMUs
880
120
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
880
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
600W
900 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8 billion
Transistors
153 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy