CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 4GB VRAM RTX A4 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1770MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+90%
13.82 TFLOPS
RTX A4 Mobile
7.25 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
VS
RTX A4 Mobile
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Apr 2021
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1297 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
2048
240
TMUs
64
120
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
113.3 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.250 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.250 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
113.3 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA107
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
Unknown
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
2
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
3
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
4
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
5
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
6
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q
7
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060
9
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
10
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Related News
1
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
2
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
3
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
4
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
5
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
6
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
7
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
8
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
9
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
10
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy