CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA GRID M60 4A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Boost Clock1178MHz
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+205%
14.75 TFLOPS
GRID M60 4A
4.825 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
GRID M60 4A
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2015
Data Center GPU
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla K8
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
Related News
1
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
2
Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon
3
Ilya Departs OpenAI to Launch New Company Aiming at Superintelligence!
4
Comprehensive Overview of AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen5 Desktop CPUs
5
Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher
6
It's 2024: This Company Released a Laptop Supporting DOS and Windows 95
7
AMD's Strix Halo Supports Up to 128GB Memory, Clearly Designed for AI Large Language Models
8
AMD to Launch Advanced Ryzen AI PRO Series Soon
9
Intel Delays Lunar Lake Shipment: Postponed from June to September
10
Initial Test Results of AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Revealed: IPC Improvement Meets Expectations
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy