CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+9%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
13.41 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Sep 2019
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1275 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
4608
256
TMUs
288
128
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.7 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
419.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
Unknown
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
3
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 1000 Model II
5
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
6
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
7
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K540Q
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla P40
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
Related News
1
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
2
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
3
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
4
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
5
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
6
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
7
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
8
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
9
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
10
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy