Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +9%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
13.41 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Sep 2019
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1275 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
4608
256
TMUs
288
128
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.7 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
419.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
Unknown
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy